What is TeleportHQ and how does it work?
TeleportHQ is a visual interface builder that generates production code. You lay out a page on a canvas with components, styles and a design system, and it exports React, Vue, Angular or plain HTML and CSS that you can take into your own repository.
There is an AI builder assistant that generates a starting layout from a prompt, real-time collaboration, hosting on a subdomain or your own domains, and a Vercel integration for deployment.
TeleportHQ standout strengths
Code export is the whole point and it is what separates this from the rest of the category. Webflow, Wix and Framer all produce sites that live on their platform, and leaving means rebuilding. TeleportHQ hands you a codebase, which means the visual builder becomes a step in a normal development workflow instead of a commitment.
The pricing is aggressive for what you get. $9 per editor a month billed annually, with unlimited projects and unlimited code exports, sits well under Webflow's equivalent tiers.
Collaboration on the free plan with unlimited collaborators is unusually generous, and useful if a designer and a developer want to work on a layout together before anyone commits money.
TeleportHQ weaknesses and drawbacks
The output needs a developer, and that shapes who this is for. Exported React is a scaffold. Someone has to wire up state, data fetching, routing beyond the basics, and deployment. A non-technical founder who exports code has a folder they cannot use.
The free plan's 5MB asset limit per project is tighter than it sounds. A couple of unoptimised photographs will exceed it, so the free tier realistically covers wireframes and simple layouts.
The AI assistant is the weakest part. It generates a plausible generic layout, and turning that into something specific takes about as long as starting from a template. Treat it as a way to avoid a blank canvas rather than as a feature you are buying.
Ecosystem is the strategic gap. Webflow's advantage is not the builder, it is the templates, the integrations, the community and the volume of tutorials. TeleportHQ has far less of all of it, which means more of the work falls back on you.
The absence of a real CMS is the other limitation. Anything blog-shaped or content-driven needs a headless CMS wired in separately, which returns you to needing a developer.
TeleportHQ pricing & plans (2026)
| Plan |
Price |
Includes |
| Free |
$0 |
3 projects, 3 pages each, 10 code views or downloads, limited AI assistant, unlimited collaborators, subdomain hosting, 5MB assets per project |
| Professional |
$9/editor/mo billed annually, $18 monthly |
Unlimited projects, unlimited code exports, unlimited AI assistant, private projects, up to 3 custom domains, 1GB assets per project, 200GB bandwidth, Vercel integration |
| Agency |
Custom |
Custom hosting, storage, bandwidth |
This fits front-end developers who would rather not hand-write layout code, design teams handing structured work to engineers, and agencies prototyping quickly before building properly. It does not fit non-technical users wanting a finished website, and it does not fit content-heavy sites needing a CMS.
Who is TeleportHQ best for?
| User type |
Why it fits |
Considerations |
| Front-end developers |
Skips layout work and exports usable React or Vue |
Export is a scaffold, not a finished app |
| Design teams |
Visual canvas that produces real code for handoff |
Smaller component and template library than Webflow |
| Agencies |
Fast prototyping at $9 per editor |
Agency tier pricing is unpublished |
| Non-technical founders |
Poor fit |
Exported code needs a developer to finish |
| Blogs and content sites |
Poor fit |
No meaningful built-in CMS |
TeleportHQ review: final verdict
TeleportHQ solves a real problem for developers. Laying out interfaces by hand is slow, and most visual builders trade that speed for platform lock-in. Getting clean React or Vue out the other end means the builder fits into a normal workflow instead of replacing it, and $9 per editor a month is a fair price for that.
It loses marks for an AI assistant that adds little, tight free-tier asset limits, no real CMS, and an ecosystem that is a fraction of Webflow's. The code export is excellent and it also defines the audience, since the export is only useful to someone who can finish it.
3.9 out of 5. Strong for developers and design-to-code teams. The wrong tool if you cannot code.
